The perspective of the narrator in this piece caught my attention even from the first sentence. The voice is ironic and funny at times that it absolutely shouldn’t be, but it works. The basic premise of the story is simply a robbery scene from the perspective of a man who has a great sense of humor, and doesn’t really feel alarmed until the very end. My favorite parts of the story, although I want to call it a narrative, were the witty lines that were either ironic or funny at inconvenient times, such as on the second page after his dog is shot and he mentions the man on TV laughing as if his dog was just shot, and on page three when the robber is sticking the gun into his side and is acting like “he wants me to have an excellent home invasion experience.” There are other smaller versions of these types of lines, but they all bring a funny appeal to a story that seems like it wouldn’t be funny, but it works.
I really did not have a lot of issues with this piece, but two areas I would like to see improved is the ending and the focus. The ending seems liked it stopped in the middle of a scene and did not finish anything. Possibly make this longer and have more happen to ensure somewhat of a ending. The focus to me was on the narrators tone and how he looks at the situations. Although there was plenty of tension with the break and and the burglars killing his dog, what was the main point. How did the character develop? Show the narrate change someway, make this experience he is having change his outlook on something. Use the break in as a means to establish character development more and you will have a terrific story.